Katie M. Snider, Ph.D., is the Executive Director and Research and Lead Evaluation Consultant with Justice Research, LLC. She also serves as a part-time research faculty at the University of Nevada, Reno. Dr. Snider holds an A.A. in Education from the Community College of Vermont (CCV), a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Colorado Colorado Springs (UCCS), and both an M.A. and Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Social Psychology from the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR).
During her graduate studies, Dr. Snider worked for the Grant Sawyer Center for Justice Studies, the Nevada Center for Surveys, Evaluation, and Statistics, and the National Judicial College. During that time, she authored over two dozen program evaluations and numerous peer reviewed publications. She has focused primarily on justice related programs and issues.
In addition to her academic training, Dr. Snider has extensive sales, management, and mentorship experience. Because of this experience, she maintains a constant awareness of how policy and procedural recommendations can impact front-line staff.
As a social psychologist, Dr. Snider is particularly interested in the lived experiences of justice involved people and families, and in how policies informed by quality research and analysis can drive meaningful improvements in our communities.
Snider KM - CV Updated Sept. 2024 (pdf)
DownloadJudges emotion: An application of the emotion regulation process model
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13218719.2021.1904454
Courtrooms are often emotionally charged atmospheres where parties have a vested interest in the proceedings and their outcomes. Judges are exposed to a wide range of emotions and stressors in the course of their work. Though the ideal of a dispassionate judge persists, more empirical work is needed to identify how judges regulate their own emotional experience in court. Using Maroney and Gross typology of emotion regulation strategies, this study explored the self-reported use and preference of these strategies among a sample of U.S. judges. Using both quantitative and qualitative approaches, we found that judges reported using a variety of intrinsic (self-directed) and extrinsic (directed toward others) emotion regulation strategies, though judges reported using some strategies such as suppression more frequently than others. We also found that many of the strategies judges described matched a subset of the strategies described by Maroney and Gross supporting their typology.
Presented at SPSP - 2019
Copyright © 2024 Justice Research, LLC - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.